The jeopardy of rule of law; democracy; separation of power and fundamental human rights in Swaziland
Swaziland is the only
absolute and pure monarchical country in Africa and has no multi-party system
and Ingenyama, the King himself enjoys absolute powers over
the executive and he is assisted by the traditional prime minister and official
prime minister.
This article portrays the real story on the way rule of law;
democracy; separation of power and fundamental human rights in Swaziland are at
risk.
In January 2014, Bhantshana Gwebu, the Government Chief Vehicle
Inspector of Swaziland was arrested basing on the reason that Gwebu had stopped
the vehicle which chauffeured Esther Ota, one of the judges of High Court in
the land.
This incidence
instigated the minds of both Thulani Maseko, human rights lawyer, activist
& thealumnus of the Centre for Human Rights, University
of Pretoria in South Africa and Bheki Makubhu, the National Magazine Editor who
published the article in National Magazine criticising the whole matter of
arresting Gwebu. The article stated only the truth that the Vehicle Inspector
was implementing his official roles thus it was unbecoming to arrest him and it
was unconstitutional. And no one is above the law and for this case respect of traffic
laws had to be followed.
Owing to that article, Maseko and Makhubu were arrested on March
18, 2014 and detained in custody for 20 days as result of the arrest warrant
issued by the Chief Justice of Swaziland, Michael Ramodibedi who is also a
judge in Lesotho.
The general rule is that courts have inherent jurisdiction in the
absence of the laws to regulate matters otherwise. If there is a law which
articulates over the certain issue that legal intuition cannot hold water. With
due respect the Chief Justice pursuant to the laws of Swaziland had no powers
to do as above mentioned since the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act No.
67/1938 under section 31(1) provides that all matters relating to issuance of
arrest warrant of any person or further detention of a person arrested without
a warrant in that legal regard vests within the magistrate not otherwise.
Basing on the above law and section 2(2) of the High Court Act No.
20 of 1954 which provides that the High Court shall exercise its powers in the
manner provided by Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act’; Judge, Mamcy Dlamin
vehemently on Sunday 6 April 2014 in the presence of about 500 audience [among
whom were the American ambassador and African Commission envoy] stated that it
was her considered views that had the applicants informed the honourable Chief
Justice as they explained to her by virtue of section 31 of the above Act he
would have not have issued the arrested warrant since the magistrate is the
only with powers.
It is important to note that freedom of expression, freedom of
media, the right to bail, right to liberty and right to work were affected to
the great extent.
The judiciary is endowed with all powers to adjudicate over
disputes of any nature involving the violation of fundamental human rights as
enshrined in the Constitution. Therefore, the courts have to safeguard the rule
of law, Bill of human rights, democracy and the common good of the people. It
is always improper the courts to be a source of conflicts.
The judiciary is the
temple of justice and the persons who sit in it have to be impartial, not
influenced in any way and should be persons of impeccable and unquestionable
loyalty but the fact is that the incumbent Chief Justice of Swaziland is facing
allegations in Lesotho and he lost an appeal for charges against him.

Furthermore, the courts have failed to interpret the 2005
Constitution of Swaziland. Section 157 of this Constitution provides that there
shall be no further appointment of Justices who are not citizens of Swaziland
and one shall be not be appointed as Justice after seven years from the
commencement of this Constitution and a judge [e.g. Ramodibedi]on contract
shall vacate office at the end of the period provided in the contract.
Unexpectedly, on 10 April 2014 the released applicant was
re-arrested as a result of an appeal by the executive to the Supreme Court and
this notorious act made the Swazi Law Society as well as the Swazi Journalists
meet to think of resolutions that could be carried out and implemented on April
14, 2014.
Generally, Swaziland is reminiscent of a cold war society as
journalists never address their views for fear of victimisation and suspension
from their jobs since such organs are owned by political elites. On 11 April
2014 the heads of the Trade Union of Swaziland were arrested. Both the lawyers
and journalists consider the judiciary as enemy of freedom of media and human
rights. The issue is unknown.
About the Author:
Njiti Lucius Batty holds a Bachelor of Laws (LLB Hons) from
Ruaha University College a Constituent College of St. Augustine University of
Tanzania, and is expected to graduate in November 2013 with a PGD in Legal
Practice at the Law School of Tanzania, Tanzania. He is a Candidate Advocate in
the High Court of Tanzania and also a Tutorial Assistant and Coordinator of the
University of Dodoma Law Society & Moot Court at the University of Dodoma,
Tanzania. His research interests include international human rights and
international humanitarian law.